Drawing for DIGITAL CINEMASTER

USPTO serial 75384283

DIGITAL CINEMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL CINEMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Ravotti

3502 Woodview TraceSuite 200Indianapolis, IN 46268

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009radios and loudspeakers for the reproduction of sound, and parts thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance