Drawing for VIRTUAL TOUR 98

USPTO serial 75384442

VIRTUAL TOUR 98

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL TOUR 98?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANSEL M SCHWARTZ

ONE STERLING PLZ - STE 304201 N CRAIG STPITTSBURGH, PA 15213

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038digital musical sound transmission of audio and video recordings over telecommunications linesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 4, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 14, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 3, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 16, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance