USPTO serial 75384870
Serial No. 75384870
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDMAN, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75384870?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNN J ALSTADT
LYNN J ALSTADT BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PC1 OXFORD CTR301 GRANT ST 20TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | FISHING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, RODS, REELS, ROD AND REEL KITS, ROD AND REEL SETS, ROD CASES, ROD HOLDERS, SPOONS, ROD PARTS AND REEL PARTS, FISHING LINE, FISHING LURES, PLUGS, SPOONS, SPINNERS, FLIERS, JIGS, RIGS, HOOKS, HOOK HOLDERS, LEADERS, SWIVELS, FLOATS, SINKERS, FISHING GAFF HOOKS, TACKLE BOXES, LURE BOXES, HANDHELD FISHING NETS, FISHING CREELS, FISH STRINGERS, FISHING BUCKETS AND CONTAINERS SPECIFICALLY ADAPTED FOR CARRYING BAIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |