USPTO serial 75385395
TECHNOBRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OTTE, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHNOBRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLARK R COWLEY
CLARK R COWLEY MICHENER LARIMORE SWINDLE WHITAKERREYNOLDS & CHARLK LLP3500 CITY CTR TWR 2301 COMMERCEFT WORTH, TX 76102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services, namely, asset acquisition consultation; due diligence review for others of telecommunications licenses, strategic plans, economic data, market forecasts, market competition data, market distribution plans, telecommunications network designs and telecommunications technology data; license valuation; analysis of telecommunications markets and competition; integration planning and implementation; market feasibility study; market forecasting; market competitive analysis; evaluation and negotiation of partnership terms and formation; bid management; market research; vender evaluation; methodology validation; process management; demand forecast integration; marketing plan development; distribution strategy; telecommunications network analysis; management of implementation and operation of telecommunication systems; analysis of financing alternatives for telecommunications operations; contract negotiation for others; technology analysis and assessment; advertising; license application and bid preparation services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Telecommunications network design and technology analysis and assessment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |