Drawing for DYNAVET UNA BUENA CONDUCTA DYNAVET FOR A WELL-BEHAVED DOG

USPTO serial 75385427

DYNAVET UNA BUENA CONDUCTA DYNAVET FOR A WELL-BEHAVED DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAVET UNA BUENA CONDUCTA DYNAVET FOR A WELL-BEHAVED DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HORST M KASPER

13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005medicated hygienic products, namely, antiseptic hygienic disposable wipes for veterinary use, medicated oral hygiene preparations, namely, pastes and liquids for the treatment of animal periodontal; disease; veterinary products, namely, veterinary vaccines for dogs, veterinary preparations for the treatment of eye infections for medical use; dietary products, namely, vitamins, tonics for veterinary useACTIVE—
009electronic devices, namely, used to prevent dogs from barking, electronic devices used for training and watching animals, namely, used to prevent dogs from going out of a defined area; electronic devices used to educate and watch children, namely, used to prevent children form going out of a defined areaACTIVE—
018leashes for animals, leather or plastic collars which include an electronic device to prevent dogs from barkingACTIVE—
028toys for animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance