Drawing for SINGLE VILLAGE MEZCAL

USPTO serial 75385437

SINGLE VILLAGE MEZCAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINGLE VILLAGE MEZCAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN CHARNAS

STEPHEN CHARNAS SUTIN THAYER & BROWNE PCP O BOX 1945ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033liquorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 2, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 26, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 20, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance