Drawing for 3D-PULTRUSION

USPTO serial 75385512

3D-PULTRUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3D-PULTRUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT J ZEH JR

HERBERT J ZEH JR REICHHOLD CHEMICALS INCP O BOX 13582RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709-3582UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal pultrusion products, namely, fiber-reinforced polymer composite reinforcement bars with a non-constant cross section formed through compression moldingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance