USPTO serial 75385629
ICE WALLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2002
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ICE WALLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | gel packs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by California Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by California Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by California Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ICE WALLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |