USPTO serial 75385718
PINNPOINT THE YEAR 2000 TOOL FOR FOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, JR. JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINNPOINT THE YEAR 2000 TOOL FOR FOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREDERICK J HAESCHE
FREDERICK J HAESCHE CITYPLACE IIMCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103-4102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programming software, namely, computer software for scanning and analyzing source codes related to applications for error tracking | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |