USPTO serial 75385855
TITAN HEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITAN HEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W MULCAHY
MSC 2061 ROBERT W MULCAHYAPPLIED MATERIALS INC2881 SCOTT BLVDSANTA CLARA, CA 95054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated machines, namely, abrasive polishers for semiconductor wafers, plasma etcher polishers for semiconductor wafers, and chemical mechanical polishers for semiconductor wafers | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |