Drawing for PREFERRED LEASE EQUIPMENT CARD

USPTO serial 75385899

PREFERRED LEASE EQUIPMENT CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREFERRED LEASE EQUIPMENT CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIT M STETINA

KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES SPECIALIZING IN THE LEASE-PURCHASE FINANCING OF OFFICE EQUIPMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 24, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance