USPTO serial 75386329
DIGITAL DNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2764480Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIGITAL DNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELODY L SCHOTTLE
SHANNON T VALE FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephones, cellular telephones, radio pagers, mobile and portable two-way radios, radio base stations, electronic telecommunications switches for cellular telephone and paging systems, blank smartcards, encoded smartcards containing programming for verifying user identification and for access control, smartcard readers, radio frequency identification tags, namely, radio frequency receivers, transmitters and readers, electronic handheld data terminals, computer software for operating and programming the foregoing goods, replacement parts for the foregoing goods and instructional manuals distributed with the foregoing goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Motorola, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Motorola, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Motorola, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIGITAL DNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |