USPTO serial 75386904
NOVA'S ARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOVA'S ARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N J RUGGIERO
LAURIE FEIGENBAUM CALLAWAY & KIRK COMPANY LLC61 BOUNTY LNJERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded videotapes featuring book characters in comedies, musical and other films principally for children, not for science education uses | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |