USPTO serial 75387113
PACIFIC CONNECTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACIFIC CONNECTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT R MILLER
SCOTT R MILLER RIORDAN & MCKINZIE300 S GRAND AVE STE 2900LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Connections of California, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Connections of California, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PACIFIC CONNECTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |