USPTO serial 75387633
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANICE W. HOUSEY
ANN K FORD ESQ PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HARDWARE CONTAINING A MICROPROCESSOR OR MICROCONTROLLER AND CONTROLLABLE BY SOFTWARE OR FIRMWARE, NAMELY, SERVERS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, MODEMS, SCANNERS, DATA OR AUDIO OR VIDEO STORAGE MEDIA, PALM-SIZE COMPUTERS OR COMMUNICATORS OR ORGANIZERS, ROUTERS, PAGERS, TELEVISION SET TOP BOXES, TELEPHONES, KEY BOARDS, AUDIO PLAYERS, AND VIDEO PLAYERS; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF MAGAZINES, REPORTS, BUSINESS PLANS, AND MANUALS ABOUT COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY OR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF MAGAZINES AND BUSINESS PLANS, ABOUT COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY OR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO FACILITATE AND COORDINATE ASYNCHRONOUS INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS AND COLLABORATION AMONG THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE PROGRAMS, COMPUTER SERVERS OR PROCESSORS AND USERS SHARING INFORMATION; AND OF HARDWARE CONTAINING A MICROPROCESSOR OF MICROCONTROLLER AND CONTROLLABLE BY SOFTWARE OR FIRMWARE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |