USPTO serial 75388311
TOOTH & GUM TONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2568513Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2002
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOOTH & GUM TONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARILYN MATTHES BROGAN
MARILYN MATTHES BROGAN FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | ORAL HYGIENE PRODUCTS FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, MOUTHWASHES, ANTIMICROBIALS AND DISINFECTANTS IN THE NATURE OF ORAL RINSES; ANTISEPTICS; TONICS USED TO TREAT GINGIVITIS, PERIODONTITIS OR HALITOSIS; ANTI-CAVITY MOUTH RINSES; TOOTHPASTES; TOOTH CLEANERS IN THE NATURE OF AN ORAL RINSE; AND TONGUE CLEANERS IN THE NATURE OF AN ORAL PREPARATION | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |