USPTO serial 75388469
S3+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S3+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M BAGARAZZI
MARK C DUKES NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLPP O BOX 11070COLUMBIA, SC 29211-1070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the administration of property and casualty insurance functions and associated documents sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MYND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by POLICY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by POLICY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named S3+
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |