USPTO serial 75388542
GENETIC ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2001
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENETIC ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SANTA CLARA, CA
SANTA CLARA, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY S. CRAIG
STEPHANIE K WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BIOTECHNOLOGY RELATED SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSIS AND LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, NUCLEIC ACID INSTRUMENTS FOR NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSIS INVOLVING ARRAYS OF NUCLEIC ACIDS ON SOLID SUPPORTS AND FOR MONITORING, TESTING AND APPROVING THE QUALITY AND SPECIFICATION OF THE SAME | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |