Drawing for AGRICULTURALWEATHER

USPTO serial 75388880

AGRICULTURALWEATHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGRICULTURALWEATHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY1 LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042WEATHER INFORMATION AND PLANNING SERVICE PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, TELEVISION, CABLE, AND TELEPHONE, OFFERING WEATHER MAPS, DATA, INFORMATION, AND GRAPHICS RELATING TO AGRICULTUREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 29, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 5, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance