USPTO serial 75389015
CERTIFIED CONFERENCE CALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERTIFIED CONFERENCE CALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
District Heights, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDER J EUCARE JR
ALEXANDER J EUCARE JR MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORP6708 LANDSDALE STDISTRICT HEIGHTS, MD 20747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services providing to individuals or businesses both local or long distance services in conjunction with using toll free 800-888-877 or other future toll free numbers that allows multiple callers on a telephone conference call to secure recordings of their conversations which can be subsequently retrieved + parties identified by voice print identification | ABANDONED | Aug 27, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |