USPTO serial 75389471
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Greenwich, CT
Norwalk, CT
NORWALK, CT
Boulder, CO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Nishi
John C. Nishi Dickinson Wright, PLLC1875 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 1200International SquareWashington, DC 20006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINES ABOUT HORSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 9, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |