USPTO serial 75389494
XSTEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 2002
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XSTEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
02210 ESPOO, FI
02210 ESPOO, FI
02130 ESPOO, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY M NATH
GARY M NATH THE NATH LAW GROUP112 South West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in designing steel structures, and computer peripherals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Custom computer programming, maintenance of computer software, updating of computer software, custom computer software design, consultancy in the field of computer software ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |