USPTO serial 75389686
CADIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CADIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES GUTTMAN
CHARLES GUTTMAN PROSKAUER ROSE LLP1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic card readers for magnetic coded cards; electronic card readers for cards containing electronic memories; electronic card readers for chip cards; electronic card readers with dual function for reading magnetic coded cards, as well as for cards containing electronic memories and for chip cards; electronic card readers for magnetic coded cards, cards containing electric memories and chip cards with integrated application of electronic payment systems; all for use in vending machines and not for use in computer based automation systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |