USPTO serial 75390106
LAW/NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAW/NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KINGSTON, ONTARIO K7L5J8, CA
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5J8, CA
KINGSTON, ONTARIO K7L 5J8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS K EBLING
LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for providing access to extracts from news source databases and bulletin boards, newspapers, wire services, broadcasts and related news services | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1986 |
| 035 | data processing services; providing information via computer pertaining to taxation and accountancy | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1986 |
| 038 | network conferencing services; electronic mail services; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users in the fields of law, taxation, accountancy, news and the environment; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1986 |
| 039 | electronic storage of data in the fields of law, taxation, accountancy, news and the environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | computer educational courses, namely, providing instruction and training in the use of database information retrieval and dissemination, bulletin boards, word and image processing and editing, data capture, network conferencing, data communications and related information services | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1986 |
| 042 | leasing computer facilities which allow access to database information retrieval and dissemination, bulletin boards, word and image processing and editing, electronic mail, data capture, network conferencing, data communications and related information services; consulting services in the field of database information retrieval and dissemination, bulletin boards, word and image processing and editing, electronic mail, data capture, network conferencing, data communications and related information services; providing information via computer pertaining to news and the environment | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEXISNEXIS CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QL Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by QUICKLAW INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LAW/NET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |