Drawing for INTERACTIVE DIGITAL THEATER

USPTO serial 75390135

INTERACTIVE DIGITAL THEATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERACTIVE DIGITAL THEATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD T BLACK

RICHARD T BLACK CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON, ET AL1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment and recreational services, namely, offering virtual reality flight simulation and other role-playing, combat missions and fantasy scenariosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 7, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 2000CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Aug 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance