USPTO serial 75390190
ADOLFO DOMINGUEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADOLFO DOMINGUEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Poligono Industrial San Ciprian de Vinas, ES
Poligono Industrial San Ciprian de Vinas, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL W KRUSE
PAUL W KRUSE PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP1100 NEW YORK AVE N WNINTH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SPECTACLES, FRAMES FOR SPECTACLES, SUNGLASSES AND FRAMES FOR SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |