USPTO serial 75390306
DECISIONBASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DECISIONBASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN
MATTHEW W WALCH LATHAM & WATKINS233 S WACKER DR STE 5800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the fields of computer systems management and software development and management, client/server database and data management operations and related tools and utilities; database access, query and reporting, analysis, navigation, implementation, administration, conversion, migration and management; data warehouse operations; database and data warehouse applications and programming tools; decision support software; database operations and data access utilizing global information network and wide area network access, and related software development tools and software utilities for use therewith; and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |