USPTO serial 75391334
AGUA MINERAL NATURAL BEZOYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGUA MINERAL NATURAL BEZOYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
28050 MADRID, ES
28050 MADRID, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N ARONSON
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | mineral and aerated waters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |