Drawing for MAJOR DAMAGE

USPTO serial 75391367

MAJOR DAMAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAJOR DAMAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WESTON, BENSHOOF, ROCHEFORT

WESTON, BENSHOOF, ROCHEFORT RUBALCAVA & MACCUISH333 S HOPE ST16TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, T-shirts, hats and jacketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 18, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 4, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance