USPTO serial 75391619
SERENDIPITEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERENDIPITEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy J. Mertzel
NANCY MERTZEL BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEIN FELDER & STEINER900 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | TEACUPS, TEAPOTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, TEA INFUSERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, AND TEA CADDIES SOLD PRIMARILY TO WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS NAMELY RESTAURANTS, CAFES, TEAHOUSES, HOTELS, CATERERS, CORPORATE DINING FACILITIES, FOODSTORES AND SUPERMARKETS AND TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS SOLELY VIA CATALOGS AND ONLINE VIA A WEBSITE | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | TEAS, LOOSE LEAF TEAS, FLAVORED TEAS, HERB TEAS, FRUIT BASED-NATURALLY CAFFEINE FREE BEVERAGES, HERBAL BASED-NATURALLY CAFFEINE FREE BEVERAGES AND INFUSIONS FOR FOODS AND/OR BEVERAGE PURPOSES SOLD PRIMARILY TO WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS NAMELY RESTAURANTS, CAFES, TEAHOUSES, HOTELS, CATERERS, CORPORATE DINING FACILITIES, FOODSTORES AND SUPERMARKETS AND TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS SOLELY VIA CATALOGS AND ONLINE VIA A WEBSITE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |