USPTO serial 75392132
ENVIROSOLVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIROSOLVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM S DORMAN
406 S BOULDER AVE STE 830TULSA, OK 74103-3835UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hazardous waste management, namely, the transportation, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous waste materials | ABANDONED | May 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |