USPTO serial 75392349
GREEN MEDICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN MEDICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Michigan City, IN
Michigan City, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L SIGALOW
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH ET ALP O BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802-3791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY, A SERIES OF BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF ARBORICULTURE; CALENDARS; DIARIES; NOTEPADS; NOTEBOOKS; JOURNALS AND FACT SHEETS IN THE FIELD OF ARBORICULTURE; SCRATCH PADS; GREETING CARDS; POSTERS IN THE FIELD OF ARBORICULTURE; AND STATIONERY, NAMELY, WRITING PAPER AND ENVELOPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWEATSHIRTS, HATS, SHOES, PANTS, BANDANAS AND JACKETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |