USPTO serial 75392530
THE QUIET MOOSE DRY GOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE QUIET MOOSE DRY GOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE F SHIELLS
THEODORE F SHIELLS GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP3000 THANKSGIVING TWR 1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edgewater Furnishings/Lover's Lane, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Edgewater Furnishings/Lover's Lane, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE QUIET MOOSE DRY GOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |