USPTO serial 75392655
GRAND RAPIDS RAMPAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAND RAPIDS RAMPAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. ONDRULA
R SCOTT KELLER WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD, LLP111 LYON ST NW STE 900GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING SOLD ONLY WITH A SPORT TEAM MOTIF REFERRING TO THE APPLICANT'S TEAM AND SOLD ONLY IN ARENA FOOTBALL LEAGUE STADIA, NAMELY, SHIRTS, JERSEYS, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SWEAT PANTS, WARM-UP SUITS, SHORTS, CAPS AND HATS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |