Drawing for G CITY OF GREEN BAY TITLETOWN USA

USPTO serial 75392786

G CITY OF GREEN BAY TITLETOWN USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G CITY OF GREEN BAY TITLETOWN USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JERRY H HANSON

JERRY H HANSON CITY OF GREEN BAY100 N JEFFERSON RM 200GREEN BAY, WI 54301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the economic development and general recognition of the City of Green Bay, WisconsinACTIVEFeb 15, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 23, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 8, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance