USPTO serial 75393496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, The
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, The
Trustees of Columbia University in the City f New York, The
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Trustees of Columbia University in the City f New York, The
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Borchard
William M. Borchard COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC114 West 47th StreetNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services; namely, [ proving ] * providing* a clinical information database for secured data entry and review which may be accessed via the global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 8, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |