USPTO serial 75393568
ACERALIA PRODUCTOS LARGOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PACIOUS, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACERALIA PRODUCTOS LARGOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRUDIE KATZ WALKER
MARIA A SAVIO GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Anchors for fastening, anvils, bells, rails for railway tracks, chains (excluding driving chains for cars), non-electric cables, non-electric wires, locks, pipes and tubes, safes, cash boxes, steel balls, nails and screws, all of the above made of metal; rolled and cast metal building materials, namely, wall panels and roofing panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Informational letters in the field of metal production; newspapers for general circulation; account and composition books; envelopes, greeting cards; news bulletins | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Warehouse storage; transport by rail, and truck | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Metal treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of metal and steel industries, namely, project appraisal and oversight; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACERALIA CORPORACION SIDERURGICA, S.A
- Other trademarks owned by ACERALIA CORPORACION SIDERURGICA, S.A
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ACERALIA PRODUCTOS LARGOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |