USPTO serial 75393773
- DTV READY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with - DTV READY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL E BELK
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORP580 WHITE PLAINS RDTARRYTOWN, NY 10591UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO CAMERAS; VIDEO TAPE PLAYERS/RECORDERS; VIDEO TAPE PLAYERS; FILM SCANNERS; FILM-TO-TAPE TRANSFER MACHINES; TELECINES UTILIZED TO TRANSFER MOTION PICTURE FILM TO VARIOUS VIDEO FORMATS; VIDEO PRODUCTION SWITCHERS; VIDEO SERVERS; ROUTING SWITCHERS; ROUTING CONTROL SYSTEMS UTILIZED TO PATCH, SWITCH, OR ROUTE VIDEO AND AUDIO SOURCE SIGNALS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS WITHIN A BROADCAST FACILITY, NAMELY, THE PHYSICAL CONTROL PANELS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT INTERFACES HUMANS TO THE ROUTING SWITCHER, THE EXTENSION PANELS AND INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDED TO LINK SEVERAL CONTROL PANELS TOGETHER TO ENHANCE OPERABILITY; MASTER CONTROL SWITCHERS (THE ACTUAL DEVICE THAT AN OPERATOR UTILIZES TO SWITCH OR MIX BETWEEN VARIOUS VIDEO AND AUDIO SOURCES); STATION AUTOMATION COMPUTERS; TELEVISION ENCODERS, DECODERS, AND MULTIPLEXERS; TELEVISION RECEIVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |