USPTO serial 75394211
ENMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY K MALKIN
JAY K MALKIN KLAAS LAW O'MEARA & MALKIN PC1999 BROADWAY STE 2225DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Public utility services in the nature of the distribution and sale of electricity to commercial, residential and/or wholesale consumers of electricity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 15, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |