Drawing for REFLECTO-SHIELD

USPTO serial 75394345

REFLECTO-SHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MELNICK, DIANE B.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFLECTO-SHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD R SCHWARTZ

EDWARD R SCHWARTZ CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Insulating film for home and commercial building windowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 16, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Apr 14, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 13, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance