Drawing for ENR EVOLUTION NOT REVOLUTION

USPTO serial 75394539

ENR EVOLUTION NOT REVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2645999Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 5, 2002
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ENR EVOLUTION NOT REVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcy J. Bergman

Marcy J. Bergman BRYAN CAVE LLP560 Mission Street, Suite 2500San Francisco, CA 94105-2998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, namely, boots, shoes, slippers, tops, tank tops, sweatshirts, blouses, vests, shirts, shorts, pants, skirts, jumpsuits, outerwear, namely, blazers, coats, jackets, and rain wear, suits, camisoles, underwear, hosiery, scarves, swimwearSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 12, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 4, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 10, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 8, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2009PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Mar 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2009AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Feb 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2009AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Feb 23, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 5, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 12, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 27, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2000PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 13, 2000PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Sep 9, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 19, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 19, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 4, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance