USPTO serial 75395567
SANTA FE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANTA FE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Glenn, Jr.
WILLIAM P GLENN JR ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY & WILLIAMS, LLP2102 MECHANIC STSTE 205GALVESTON, TX 77550Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2002 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |