Drawing for ENFORM ENERGY INFORMATION SERVICES

USPTO serial 75395850

ENFORM ENERGY INFORMATION SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENFORM ENERGY INFORMATION SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI

ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI BAKER & BOTTS LLP1 SHELL PLZ910 LOUISIANAHOUSTON, TX 77002-4995

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely an energy information system for tracking, monitoring, displaying, storing, and reporting actual, projected, and historical energy consumptionACTIVEOct 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 26, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 21, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 4, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance