Drawing for ID

USPTO serial 75396003

ID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW B MAYFIELD

ANDREW B MAYFIELD ARMSTRONG TEASDALE SCHLAFLY & DAVIS1 METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ready-to-assemble computer furniture, namely, workstations and mobile work centersACTIVEMay 19, 1997
020ready-to-assemble furniture, namely, desks, entertainment centers, TV/VCR cabinets and carts, bookcases, and cabinetsACTIVEMay 19, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 2, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 28, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 24, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance