USPTO serial 75396087
BEST START
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST START?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE H POSORSKE
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, meat and game meats; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; fruit sauces; eggs; milk; edible oils and fats; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fish fillets | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | food products, namely, sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; coffee substitutes; flour; bread; pastries; honey; treacle; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; ice; ice cream; ice milk; frozen yogurt; processed cereals; cereal based snack foods; flavored ices; relishes; catsup; confectionery, namely, frozen confections, cookies, candies, and chocolates; and processed instant cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |