USPTO serial 75396171
COMMUNITY BANKING ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNITY BANKING ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeff C. Dodd
JEFF C DODD MAYOR, DAY, CALDWELL, AND KEETON, LLP700 LOUISIANA STE 1900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2778UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Full service banking services provided by means of an on-line computer network, namely, on-line computer banking services whereby bank customers can deposit, withdraw, or transfer funds, or make loan payments; banking services available by means of a computer link; trust and escrow management services in the fields of investments, real estate, mortgages, automobile loans and lines of credit; and brokerage of annuities, insurance, stocks and bonds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |