Drawing for MUNCH MADNESS

USPTO serial 75396249

MUNCH MADNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUNCH MADNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATHLEEN J GALLAGHER

KATHLEEN J GALLAGHER NABISCO BRANDS CO1 S WACKER DR STE 2740CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Spreads, namely, cheese spreads; processed nuts; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts; and potato-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030crackers; pretzels; corn chips; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; snacks, namely, wheat-based, rice-based and corn-based snack foods; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers; pretzels and/or popped popcorn; cones for ice cream; cookie and cracker crumbs; pie crusts; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; granola-based snack bars; toaster pastries and tarts; steak sauceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 15, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 4, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance