USPTO serial 75396873
TRI-VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2003
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRI-VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES LAFF
CHARLES A LAFF MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP180 N STETSON AVE STE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic equipment, namely-- remote controllers; radio frequency amplifiers; television converters; radio frequency splitters, taps and power inverters; microprocessors and microprocessor chips; decoder chips for controlling access to television programs; satellite receivers; high frequency modulators and demodulators; addressable and pay television equipment for residential, commercial and institutional use; teletext machines; and parts, for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | consultation services in the fields of engineering, communications, cable television plant systems, remote communications control equipment, applied integrated circuit devices for the communications industry, teletext equipment, and pay-per-view and addressable pay television system and equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRI-VISION ELECTRONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRI-VISION ELECTRONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRI-VISION ELECTRONICS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRI-VISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |