USPTO serial 75397363
DMMS DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DMMS DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SONOPRESS Produktionsgesellschaft fur Ton- und Informationstrager mbH
D-33311 Gutersloh, DE
Other trademarks owned by SONOPRESS Produktionsgesellschaft fur Ton- und Informationstrager mbH
SONOPRESS Produktionsgesellschaft fur Ton- und Informationstrager mbH
D-33311 Gutersloh, DE
Other trademarks owned by SONOPRESS Produktionsgesellschaft fur Ton- und Informationstrager mbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY R MOORE
STANLEY R MOORE JENKENS & GILCHRIST3200 FOUNTAIN PL1445 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in multimedia database management | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SONOPRESS Produktionsgesellschaft fur Ton- und Informationstrager mbH
- Other trademarks owned by SONOPRESS Produktionsgesellschaft fur Ton- und Informationstrager mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DMMS DIGITAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |