USPTO serial 75397379
HEREAFTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEREAFTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH R ABRAMS
KEITH R ABRAMS RIVKIN RADLER & KREMER30 N LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60602-2507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | General feature consumer magazine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |